Monday, November 25, 2019

Canvas LMS • Planning your Own Game.


Working in Canvas LMS was interesting. I did not understand the program well enough to know how to create my course. I was able to figure out how to add my own color to the course an image and how to add different assignments and sections. I was also able to add announcements to students and this had a lot of options so I liked this availability of styling.

These are the things I liked about Canvas:
  • Simplicity of layout 
  • Modern users interface and navigation 
  • Rubric options were available but I did not know how to link my Calendar, plan my dates and add Rubric - I am thinking this is an add-in the correct order issue. 
  • I would love tips on how to know how expert advanced/LMS designers plan their courses 
  • Tips on changing due dates/assignments to readjust for students progress
These are the things I found difficult about Canvas
  • Setting up an LMS account was not easily understandable for a newbie. 
  • Adding students was confusing. I researched and found you need to publish to add additional teachers and accounts/students. 
  • There should be a test option link to see what is shared as a teacher. (Maybe there is?). 
  • It would help to have preset templates that you can redesign until you understand the process better. 
  • I am still deciding if I like the pop-up stacks? Will it be easy for students to navigate? I liked how it looks better but Schoology folders feel easier to understand for new students.
Overall I liked the fact that I have a course up and ready for someone to view. I like that Canvas is free for use and you could send an LMS completed class to use immediately. This is great for a new ID because you can should that you are able to create LO’s and understand the complicated structure of online courses. I feel that we as online students have an advantage as we can think of our experiences learning online. What was easy for us to understand and what was something we struggled with. I think this makes us more empathetic towards our learners. I do not think my course is perfect but I really enjoyed the process of being able to create a functioning course.

What do I need more work on?
Calendar and planning of availability of content. I have heard different feedback. Some students like all of the assignments available because they like to know the full scope of the course. Others have mentioned they like the material chunked as to not overwhelm. I am ok with either type of presentation of material. Time/experience is where I can see the value of knowing how to quickly create courses. Planning with others/SME’s can also add some input on how the course should look and function. I can see where a teaching background might make this process more seamless. I felt like I was doing all of this at once while learning the program but it was fun! I like my course so far.

Monday, November 11, 2019

Formative vs. Summative Assessments

This week we learned about Formative vs. Summative Assessments here is a comparison, our teacher created a video and this chart screencap is something I want to remember.

Monday, November 4, 2019

UDL: Universal Design for Learning

Reflect on the three principles of universal design from CAST. Include the following:

  • How you can implement all 3 within an online course or training module - I added these on each of the 3 principles sections but a variation of options for students is the best approach and with all of the amazing Web 2.0 Tools the options for reaching students is endless. There are also innovative ways to accommodate accessibility in your eLearning to make sure all students are heard and recognized for their skills and abilities. This makes the classroom better for all and learning from each other is a big benefit of learning online. In a traditional classroom, students sit and mostly listen to the teacher. Online you can form your own voice and identity and have your talents recognized. It is also great to offer the convenience of online learning for someone who cannot make it to the campus or lives far from the college. This can be a physical or obstacle or a visual barrier. With the Jaws software, they can participate and learn from their own home location. This opens so many options for so many people: the true meaning of Universal Design.
  1. Multiple means of representation - For purposeful, motivated learners, stimulate interest and motivation for learning. This is also referred to as the “what” of learning. A way to incorporate this into your eLearning or LMS courses is to provide multiple options for each lesson. This can include digital (video or audio), visual examples for students to review and chunking or simplifying content for complicated subjects. Project idea: give a list of different digital project options. IE Thinglink, Gliffy or YouTube for students to create a short project for an assignment. The accessibility can be related to the following but not limited to: Cognitive/Intellectual, Visual, Motor/Mobility and Auditory and also ESL and ELL students.
  2. Multiple means of action and expression - For resourceful, knowledgeable learners, present information and content in different ways. This is also referred to as the “how” of learning. A way to incorporate this into your eLearning or LMS courses is to offer multiple ways for the students to use technology to communicate their ideas/projects. You can also have students evaluate their own projects and provide feedback during the learning/working process. A project you can create in your eLearning could be: the student creating a PPT or an audio recording or Podcast.
  3. Multiple means of engagement - For strategic, goal-directed learners, differentiate the ways that students can express what they know. This is also referred to as the “why” of learning. A way to incorporate this into your eLearning or LMS courses is to allow for varying levels of difficulties for students. Offer additional ways for students to contribute as feedback, forum, and student reviews. A text to audio option for reading material is a great suggestion for someone who has dyslexia or visual impairment. Students could create a Form or Quiz in Google Docs to interact with fellow students and the material. This is a free form of software available on most digital devices. Most LMS has the option of creating a forum where the students can get and give feedback to assignments. This creates a sense of teamwork that is great for students in their future job roles and leadership goals. 
For online content, you need to consider accessibility because it makes learning better for everyone. While these start out as a way to help anyone with learning or physical barriers it really makes the training clearer and easier to access for all of us. There are great tools now for adding accessibility to your training. *The NVDA Screen Reader Access, the CC options on YouTube and other text to audio options are just a few. **For Web Accessibility (WCAG  is an acronym for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines published by  Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) and World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) there is Wave, Jaws, Dynomapper and SortSite to name just a few. 


“NV Access.” NV Access, https://www.nvaccess.org/.


“Top 20 Accessibility Testing Tools for Web Applications.” Software Testing Help, 21 Aug. 2019, https://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/accessibility-testing-tools/.

Reflect on the guidelines included in the checklist and creating accessible documents.
  • What guidelines do you need to focus on when creating online content and documents for your learners. Which of these guidelines do you already do when creating content for your learners?
This explanation of accessibility definitions and the items we should be looking out for when designing online eLearning courses are taken from the Software Testing Help website and they provide many tools to use to make sure all students are able to learn equally. 

Accessibility is the term that refers to the accessibility of any software system to people without or with physical disability or impairments. Such impairments include the following:
  • Visual Impairments – Color blindness, low vision, complete or partial blindness, etc
  • Hearing Disabilities- Hyperacusis, Deafness, etc
  • Learning Disabilities – Dyslexia
  • Cognitive Impairments – Autism or any kind of head injury
  • Deftness, paralysis, cerebral palsy, etc
Following tasks are being verified by Accessibility Testing Tools:
  1. Descriptive Link Text
  2. Avoid Pop-ups
  3. Small and simple sentences
  4. Simple language
  5. Easy navigations
  6. Use of CSS layouts instead of HTML
According to working specifications, Accessibility Testing Tools are categorized as:
  1. Screen Reader Software: Read out the contents on the screen
  2. Speech Recognition Software: Converts the spoken words into text
  3. Special Keyboard: Ease of typing using this keyboard especially people with motor impairments
  4. Screen Magnification Software: Dedicated to vision-impaired users thus it is used to enlarge the display such that the reading will be easier
“Top 20 Accessibility Testing Tools for Web Applications.” Software Testing Help, 21 Aug. 2019, https://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/accessibility-testing-tools/.

Universal Design for Learning Assignment Video